|
Press Spins Sins
BY Donald DeMarco June 15-21, 2008 Issue |
Posted 6/10/08 at 10:02 AM
Archbishop Gianfranco Girotti, who occupies the
second highest place in the Vatican’s “Apostolic Penitentiary,” may be
wondering what the appropriate penance is that the mainstream media should pay
for turning his comments about confession into an international burlesque.
In
a March interview with L’Osservatore Romano, the good bishop bemoaned the fact that, according to a study by Milan’s
Catholic University, 60% of Italian Catholics have stopped going to confession.
He also expressed concern that, according to the study, 30% of the same
Catholics do not believe there is a need for a priest to be an intermediary.
When
asked what he believed today’s “new sins” are, he referred to the violations of
human rights that are going on through embryonic stem-cell research, genetic
manipulation and abortion. He also made reference to “ecological” offenses,
such as pollution.
To
this somewhat off-hand catalogue of four, he added drug-taking, the
accumulation of excessive wealth, and causing poverty.
Vesting
Girotti with powers he does not pretend to have, the media credited him with
the remarkable achievement of replacing the classical Seven Deadly Sins with a
new septet.
The
UK’s Daily Telegraph, for example,
ran an article entitled. “Recycle or Go to Hell,” in which it reported that the
new list of sins “replaces the list originally drawn up by Pope Gregory the
Great in the sixth century.” The Fox News statement, “Vatican Adds Seven New
Deadly Sins,” was echoed in various parts of the world:
• Boston: “Vatican Lists Pollution as New Sin,”
• Chicago: “Vatican Modernizes 7 Deadly Sins,”
• Tampa Bay: “Pope Identifies New Sins,”
• Associated Press: “Vatican Updates Its
Thou-Shalt-Not List,”
• Australia, “Polluters’ Souls in Danger,”
• London: “Avoid Recycling, Go to Hell,”
• Turkey: “Seven Deadly Sins Doubled,” and
• India: “Vatican’s New Seven Deadly Sins Include
Being Filthy Rich.”
It
should be noted that the “Seven Deadly Sins” are not really sins, exactly, but
dispositions toward them. Their origin goes back to the First Letter of St.
John (15-16), where the Gospel writer refers to the “lust of the flesh,” “lust
of the eyes” and the “pride of life.”
According
to St. Augustine, lust, gluttony, and sloth exemplify the “lust of the flesh,”
while greed is synonymous with “lust of the eyes,” and pride, envy, and anger
are identified with the “pride of life.”
A
penitent does not confess “pride” but only the transgressions or the specific
sins that flow from it. Conversely, by rooting out the so-called “deadly” or
“capital” sins, one is taking a decisive step in removing the basis for
committing specific sins.
Another
important point that the international media failed to report is that sin, in
the primary sense of the term, is an offense against God.
“Sin
is a rejection of relationality,” writes Cardinal Ratzinger in his 1986 opus, In the
Beginning ... Catholic Understanding of the Story of Creation and the Fall. One does not sin, strictly speaking, against the
environment.
The environment has no capacity to care what we do
to it. After all, it was once a whirling ball of fire. Nevertheless, the future
Benedict XVI is at some pains to emphasize that God’s directive expressed in
Genesis 2:15 “to till it and keep it” means that humankind is “supposed to look
after the world as God’s creation in accordance with the rhythm and the logic
of creation.”
In other words, with respect to the
environment, God has commanded us to be responsible stewards. Ecological
recklessness, then, is a sin against God. It is in no way a “new” sin.
Misunderstanding
is one thing. Misrepresentation is another. The second is less excusable than
the first.
But
mockery can be venal, especially when it is leveled against a Church that is
trying to offer light for a world plunged in darkness.
At
the same time, mockery is hardly a new sin.
How
much damage control, one may ask, can the Catholic media provide against the
tidal wave of mockery that routinely gushes forth from the secular media?
This
writer was asked to offer his own comments on the Girotti affair by ABC News in
New York. I obliged, though I do not know if they were taken with more than a
grain of salt.
Perhaps
we should see each treachery as an opportunity to teach.
Educated
Catholics, then, should be tireless teachers, as well as indefatigable
learners.
Donald DeMarco
is adjunct professor at
Holy Apostles
College and Seminary
in Cromwell,
Connecticut.
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.
Click here to donate
|