|
Letters 05.04.2008
May 4-10, 2008 Issue |
Posted 4/29/08 at 2:42 PM
Knee-Jerk Response
In response to the letter from Sister Simone Campbell,
“Serious Questions” (April 6) regarding her apparent opposition to John McCain,
I would agree that Catholics should not be single-issue voters.
First of all, I thank you for the generosity of acting on
the gift of your vocation. I also commend you on your obvious concern regarding
important social issues.
The mistake that Sister Simone makes (along with many
others) is the assumption that if one does not see government as the solution
to the many ills of society, one does not care about these issues. This is
plain wrong.
Perhaps Mr. McCain recognizes that, after 40 years and
trillions of dollars taken from taxpayers at the point of a gun, the
big-government war on poverty has been an abject failure. And the knee-jerk
response to that failure on the part of many is more of the same.
Mr. McCain should be commended for recognizing that more of
the same failing policies might not be a good idea, at least not if you really
want to help people.
I would also suggest that Mr. McCain recognizes that,
regardless of the merits of our prosecuting this war with Iraq, we have to
remain engaged.
There is little doubt that if we abandon the Iraqi people at
this critical junction that between Iran and the jihadists hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis will be murdered.
What is the social justice of that decision?
And finally, her comment about his supporting economic
policies that favor the rich over the poor and vulnerable ignores the fact that
the top 10% of income earners carry 90% of the federal tax burden.
What is fair about that? What is fair about people who don’t
even pay Federal taxes but will receive a rebate?
There is much wrong with our tax system but I dare say that
Sister Simone and I are on opposite ends of the spectrum as to the solution.
The fact is that a great many Catholics would support Mr.
McCain for many of the same reasons she apparently doesn’t support him.
In addition, for many Catholics, they see abortion as a much
greater moral evil than whether we extend a government-run health insurance
program meant for children to adults (especially since we recognize it as a
step toward universal, socialized medicine).
To not place an overwhelming emphasis on the murder of more
than 1 million babies in favor of opposition to a war, the expansion of a
failed government program and the further redistribution of wealth beyond what
is already done is in my view having the wrong priorities.
There is no doubt that Republicans have flaws. But I will
accept a great many flaws if they are ardently opposed to the legal genocide of
babies.
I can easily live with myself voting for John McCain but
would rush to confession if I ever voted for a pro-abortion candidate. That is
how my conscience has been formed and while I recognize that each of us will be
judged according to our actions, I just find it hard to believe that Christ
would find fault with my priorities.
It appears that Sister Simone might, and that is a shame.
Earl H. Scott
Marietta, Georgia
Wrong Answer
Regarding Sister Simone Campbell’s “Serious Questions”
letter (April 6) bashing McCain is strangely silent about Obama and Hillary
supporting the intrinsic evils of abortion, euthanasia, human cloning,
embryonic stem-cell research and homosexual unions.
In “Worthiness to Receive Holy Communion — General
Principles,” then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger said, “There may be a legitimate
diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the
death penalty, but not, however, with regard to abortion and euthanasia.”
“On Our Civic Responsibility for the Common Good,” by
Archbishop Raymond Burke, says, “One cannot justify a vote for a candidate who
promotes intrinsically evil acts that erode the very foundation of the common
good, such as abortion and same-sex ‘marriage,’ by appealing to that same
candidate’s opposition to war or capital punishment. ... These elements are so
fundamental to the common good that they cannot be subordinated to any other
cause, no matter how good.”
Pope John Paul II makes the same point in Section 38 of
Christifideles Laici (The Vocation and the Mission of the Lay Faithful in the
Church and in the World).
Voting for the party of death and its candidates who promote
intrinsic evils, bigger government, class envy/hate and socialism does not
serve the common good and is definitely not the faithful Catholic’s answer.
Paul Rosenthal
Augusta, Georgia
Deo Gratias
Thank you so much for the coverage of our beloved Holy
Father’s visit. We are cloistered contemplatives, and do not own a TV, but we
did make visits to your Pope2008 site to keep up with the different events and
news of the visit. What a blessing! We enjoyed the blog immensely and just
wanted to thank you for all the hard work and love that went into pulling this
all together. With an assurance of our prayers for your wonderful work,
Mother Dolores Marie
Poor Clares of Perpetual Adoration
St. Joseph Monastery
Portsmouth, Ohio
Cherry-Picking the Issues
I continue to be amazed by the Catholics who try to convince
themselves and others that it’s okay to vote for one of the Democratic
presidential candidates.
“Catholics aren’t single issue voters” is usually their
rallying cry, and then they trot out their list of other issues like the war in
Iraq, health care, immigration and other social justice concerns.
These Catholics seem to be reading the U.S. bishops’
“Faithful Citizenship” document the way many people read the Bible, picking and
choosing the verses that fit their own perspective and agenda. The document
might say that Catholics are not single issue voters, but it also emphasizes
that “temptations in public life can distort the Church’s defense of human life
and dignity: The first is a moral equivalence that makes no ethical distinctions
between different kinds of issues involving human life and dignity. The direct
and intentional destruction of innocent human life from the moment of
conception until natural death is always wrong and is not just one issue among
many. It must always be opposed.”
In Sister Simone Campbell’s recent letter, “Serious
Questions” (April 6) she notes that John McCain has received a rating from the
Children’s Defense Fund as the “worst senator on children’s issues.”
What a farce! Apparently the intrinsic evil of abortion
isn’t even a factor in the determination of this ranking. Abortion is a
non-issue for the Children’s Defense Fund.
“Faithful Citizenship” also reminds us: “It is important to
be clear that the political choices faced by citizens not only have an impact
on general peace and prosperity but also may affect the individual’s
salvation.”
Pro-abortion candidates and the people who vote for them
should be worrying about that day when they meet Jesus face-to-face and have to
answer for how they did or did not defend his little ones — all 50 million of
them, and counting.
Maris Stella Bentley
Omaha, Nebraska
Clarification & Correction
Explanations are in order for our article “Hijacked? (March
2-8, 2008).
1. The article uses the verb “routed” to describe what
happens to pregnant callers to the suicide hotline. This is an error. Calls are
not “routed” to Planned Parenthood from the suicide hotline.
Callers are given referrals to agencies and organizations
that answer the needs they have.
2. There is apparently no national policy for the hotline on
how to handle pregnant callers. Those decisions are made by the counselors
working at each call center.
It is reasonable to assume that pregnant callers are
referred to Planned Parenthood because it is an international, socially
respected, and partially taxpayer-funded organization that exists ostensibly to
help pregnant women.
However, we should have made clear in the article that the
main point of contention isn’t that there is a policy of referring to Planned
Parenthood, but that there is no policy prohibiting such referrals. No research
has been done on the pregnancy status of hotline callers or the results of
their calls.
3. The story should have made clear that the original
hotline, when under Butler’s control, also had no national policy about how to
handle pregnant callers.
However, it does report on H. Reese Butler efforts to build
a suicide hotline whose policy is to refer callers to pregnancy crisis centers
that don’t make money from abortion, as Planned Parenthood does. We regret the
errors. But insofar as the article alerts the National Suicide Hotline to the
needs of pregnant callers, it can be of great value. Mothers need to know the
pain and horror that can be caused by abortion.
As the Supreme Court’s opinion in last year’s Carhart vs.
Casey said, the federal government has an interest in ensuring that pregnant
women know the facts about abortion, and not be left at the mercy of those who
might pressure her into a decision that she will later come to regret:
“The [Partial-Birth Abortion Ban] Act also recognizes that
respect for human life finds an ultimate expression in a mother’s love for her
child. Whether to have an abortion requires a difficult and painful moral
decision (see Casey, 852-3) which some women come to regret. In a decision so
fraught with emotional consequence, some doctors may prefer not to disclose
precise details of the abortion procedure to be used. It is, however, precisely
this lack of information that is of legitimate concern to the State. The
State’s interest in respect for life is advanced by the dialogue that better
informs the political and legal systems, the medical profession, expectant
mothers, and society as a whole of the consequences.”
Additional Info
To order the CD “Praying the Rosary with St. Alphonsus Maria
Liguori,” featured in our April 27 Arts interview with musician Ray Herrmann,
go to LittleLambMusic.com or call (800) 231-1207.
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.
Click here to donate
|